Case 2601802/2023 · Employment Tribunal
David Wright v Briq Furniture Limited and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2601802/2023
- Decision date
- 18 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
David Wright
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Region of the Employment Tribunals on 11 August 2023. The respondents did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge therefore made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Briq Furniture Limited and Briq Holdings Limited were jointly liable for unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The judgment records that they must pay David Wright £9,177.00 gross.
The hearing listed for 2 February 2024 was cancelled after the rule 21 judgment was entered on 18 January 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondents failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment records that the respondents are jointly liable for unauthorised deductions from wages and must pay £9,177.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £9,177 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,177
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.