Case 2601808/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Kerry Newman v Ashley Boxall and Joanne Boxall T/A Sunkist & Herons Mead — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601808/2021
- Decision date
- 19 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Kerry Newman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote remedy hearing before Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone in Nottingham on 12 January 2022. The tribunal amended the respondent name to Ashley Boxall and Joanne Boxall trading as Sunkist and Herons Mead.
The tribunal recorded that the respondents had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £9,898.00. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,083.72.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,924.56 and a compensatory award of £11,846.42, and stated that the Recoupment Regulations did not apply. It further found that the respondents had failed to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment and awarded £1,710.72. The total compensation ordered was £26,463.42.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £9,898.00. | Upheld | — | £9,898 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £1,083.72. | Upheld | — | £1,084 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,924.56 and a compensatory award of £11,846.42, and said the Recoupment Regulations did not apply. | Upheld | — | £13,771 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondents had failed to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment and awarded £1,710.72. | Upheld | — | £1,711 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,463
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,925
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £11,846
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.