Case 2601811/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Crumley v Key Electrical Solutions Ltd (t/a Key Electrical) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601811/2019
- Decision date
- 9 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Crumley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment dated 9 August 2019 in which Employment Judge Hutchinson recorded that the claim succeeds. The extracted text is the standard universal template and does not set out any substantive findings of fact or reasons beyond the successful outcome.
The judgment states that remedy will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. It also records that the hearings listed for 30 October 2019 and 27, 29 and 30 April 2020 are cancelled. No monetary award is given in the extracted judgment.
Because the PDF text does not identify the individual causes of action, the claim entries are inferred from the case listing metadata rather than from a detailed discussion in the judgment itself. No legal test is named in the extracted text, and no lay members are listed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment is a Rule 21 template and does not specify the pleaded cause(s) of action in the extracted text. Layer 1 metadata listed Public Interest Disclosure, and this entry reflects that hint rather than a reasoned finding in the PDF text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment is a Rule 21 template and does not specify the pleaded cause(s) of action in the extracted text. Layer 1 metadata listed unfair dismissal, and this entry reflects that hint rather than a reasoned finding in the PDF text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment is a Rule 21 template and does not specify the pleaded cause(s) of action in the extracted text. Layer 1 metadata listed unlawful deduction from wages, and this entry reflects that hint rather than a reasoned finding in the PDF text. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.