Case 2601824/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Greenwood v KRCS Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601824/2022
- Decision date
- 20 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Greenwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr L Greenwood applied for interim relief against KRCS Group Ltd under sections 128 and 129 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The hearing took place at Hull on 8 September 2022 before Employment Judge Miller, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal refused the application. It held that it did not appear likely that, on determining the complaint at a final hearing, the tribunal would find that the reason or principal reason for the claimant’s dismissal was a reason specified in section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment records that a preliminary hearing in private for case management by telephone was listed for 3 November 2022 at 10am. No financial award was made in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Application for interim relief under sections 128 and 129 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was refused. The tribunal did not consider it likely that, at a final hearing, it would find that the reason or principal reason for dismissal was a section 103A ERA reason. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- sections 128 and 129 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.