Case 2601827/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Goode v SOFA (A registered charity) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601827/2018
- Decision date
- 23 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Goode
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short record of the hearing on 6 September 2019 before Employment Judge Ahmed sitting alone at Leicester. It states that the parties had agreed terms of settlement, and the hearing was adjourned for the settlement terms to be carried into effect.
No substantive findings of fact or law are recorded in the written decision, and no separate remedy award is set out. The document is therefore a settlement disposal rather than a determination of liability on the merits. The judge also noted that reasons for the judgment had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment records that the parties had agreed terms of settlement and that the hearing was adjourned for the settlement terms to be carried into effect. No substantive determination of the underlying claim is set out in the text. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.