Case 2601830/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Kaur v Synergy Health Managed Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601830/2021
- Decision date
- 22 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Kaur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 28 August 2021 and included a complaint of unfair dismissal and acts of discrimination up to and including 6 May 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that the discrimination claims succeed. It does not record a final determination on the unfair dismissal complaint in the extracted text provided. Remedy was not assessed in the judgment itself; the tribunal said that the claimant's entitlement would be determined at a Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The extracted judgment text does not identify the protected characteristic, but the case listing classifies the matter as race discrimination. The judgment records that the discrimination claims succeed and that remedy will be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.