Case 2601837/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Singh v Powar Haulage Ltd & Singh Paul Haulage Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601837/2018
- Decision date
- 19 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Singh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment of Employment Judge Camp dated 19 August 2019 records that the proceedings in case 2601837/2018 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, Mr K Singh. The text does not set out any substantive findings on liability, does not record a hearing on the merits, and does not identify any remedy award.
No reasons are given beyond the fact of withdrawal, so the judgment contains no factual findings about the underlying dispute between Mr Singh and Powar Haulage Ltd and Singh Paul Haulage Ltd. The available text is limited to the formal dismissal order under rule 52 following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment text only states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the underlying claim type is taken from the case listing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment text only states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the underlying claim type is taken from the case listing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.