Case 2601843/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Richards in person For the v Mr McBride, Solicitor — 2023
- Case reference
- 2601843/2022
- Decision date
- 12 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Richards in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Clark sitting alone in Nottingham on 6 June 2023. The respondent applied to strike out certain parts of the claimant's claims for failure to comply with a case management order, but that application was refused.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal struck out the race discrimination claims as having no reasonable prospect of success insofar as they were set out at numbers 4, 13, 15, 21, 23, 24, 25, 27, 31 and 33 of the table of allegations. The judgment does not dispose of any remaining race allegations outside that list. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal struck out the disability discrimination claims as having no reasonable prospect of success insofar as they were set out at numbers 6, 13, 27, 31, 33 and 34 of the table of allegations. The judgment does not dispose of any remaining disability allegations outside that list. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- conducted proceedings unreasonably
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.