Case 2601845/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Rosel v Coventry Engineering Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601845/2019
- Decision date
- 8 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Rosel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Hutchinson found that Coventry Engineering Group Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr M Rosel's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £673.55 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £783.22 for that claim. The judgment lists the hearing as cancelled and gives no further reasoning, legal test, or split of any additional remedy beyond the two sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £673.55 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £674 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £783.22 for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £783 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,457
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.