Case 2601849/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Booth v Touch EE Ltd FINAL HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601849/2019
- Decision date
- 23 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Booth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Booth’s claim against Touch EE Ltd was heard at Midlands (East) before Employment Judge Camp. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented for only part of the hearing by Mr D Colin, a former director. The tribunal gave judgment orally, with written reasons to follow.
The tribunal dismissed the claim on a technical basis because it did not have jurisdiction to deal with it. The judgment states that the dismissal was not on the merits. It also records that the dismissal should not prevent the claimant from bringing a County Court claim if he wishes, although that would be a matter for the County Court and not for the Employment Tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action. It states only that the claimant’s claim was dismissed because the Employment Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to deal with it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.