Case 2601851/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Innocent Mushambapode v The Governing Body of Fulhurst Community College — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601851/2019
- Decision date
- 23 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer Representation
- Venue
- Leicester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Innocent Mushambapode
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leicester on 23 October 2019 before Employment Judge Brewer. The claimant, Innocent Mushambapode, appeared in person with assistance from Mr A Denath. The respondent was represented by Mr A Hodge of Knights PLC.
The written judgment records only the tribunal's decisions. The claim for unfair dismissal was dismissed, the claim for race discrimination was dismissed, and the claim for disability discrimination was dismissed. No remedy was awarded and no split of compensation is recorded in the decision.
The extracted judgment text does not set out further findings of fact or reasoning. It also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.