Case 2601853/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Mortimer v Passion2Dance Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2601853/2023
- Decision date
- 16 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Mortimer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal recorded that the respondent company, Passion2Dance Limited, had been dissolved and that the claimant had not successfully applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies. On that basis, the tribunal considered the position under the claim as brought against a dissolved respondent.
The tribunal also recorded that on 11 January 2025 it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason in response.
The judgment therefore states that the claim was struck out. No monetary award was made, and the extracted text does not identify any separate remedy findings or any further substantive determination of the underlying claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment states only that 'the claim is struck out'; it does not specify the underlying heads of claim in the provided text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.