Case 2601855/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Dr T Mustafa v Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 2601855/2020
- Decision date
- 13 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer JUDGMENT
- Venue
- Midlands East Tribunal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr T Mustafa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the respondent did not contest the claimant's claim of unfair dismissal. The tribunal therefore ordered that the claim succeeds and is upheld.
The parties agreed terms as to remedy by consent. The respondent was ordered to pay a basic award of £1,312.50 and a compensatory award of £86,444.
For recoupment purposes, the full compensatory award was identified as the prescribed element, attributable to the period from 15 February 2020 to 13 September 2021. The amount by which the monetary award exceeded the prescribed element was recorded as nil, and the respondent was to hold and release the prescribed element in accordance with the applicable recoupment regulations.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The respondent did not contest the unfair dismissal claim, which was upheld. Remedy was agreed by consent. | Upheld | — | £87,757 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £87,757
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,313
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £86,444
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.