Case 2601861/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Khan v Worldpay (UK) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601861/2019
- Decision date
- 25 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 16 September 2019, the tribunal wrote to the claimant giving him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The reason was that he had not complied with the tribunal's order of 28 June 2019, which required him within four weeks to set out in writing to the respondent what remedy the tribunal was being asked to award, together with any evidence and documentation supporting what was claimed and how it was calculated.
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make any sufficient representations explaining why strike out should not follow, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The hearing listed for 21 October 2019 was vacated and would not take place. The extracted text does not record any substantive merits determination or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim type in the extracted text; it records only that "the claim" was struck out for failure to comply with the case management order requiring the claimant to set out the remedy sought, with supporting evidence and calculation. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.