Case 2601861/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Katie Robinson v Lincs Recycling — 2025
- Case reference
- 2601861/2024
- Decision date
- 6 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Lincoln Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Katie Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an attended hearing on 13 January 2025, Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone found that Lincs Recycling (2024) Ltd had made an unlawful deduction from Miss Katie Robinson’s wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £4,118.40 gross in respect of that deduction.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in relation to notice and awarded £457.60 compensation. In a further finding, it held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £457.60 for that claim. The total amount payable was £5,033.60.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £4,118.40 gross for an unlawful deduction of wages. | Upheld | — | £4,118 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered £457.60 compensation. | Upheld | — | £458 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £457.60. | Upheld | — | £458 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,034
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.