Case 2601869/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Scott v Premier Foods Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601869/2019
- Decision date
- 28 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Britton
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Scott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Britton, sitting alone in Nottingham on 23 October 2019, dealt with a preliminary time-limit issue arising from Mr Scott's unfair dismissal claim. The ET1 had been presented on 24 June 2019, but the tribunal found that the dismissal date was 8 March 2019 and that, after ACAS early conciliation, the deadline for presenting the claim was 21 June 2019. The claim was therefore three days late, and the question was whether it had not been reasonably practicable to present it in time and whether it had then been presented within a reasonable period.
Applying the reasonably practicable test and citing Palmer v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council and Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser, the tribunal accepted Mr Scott's evidence that he was in mental shock after being summarily dismissed following 33 years' service, that he was in a low mood and emotionally affected by the dismissal and other family pressures, and that he was focused on finding and keeping new employment. The tribunal also found that he did not properly take in the ACAS early conciliation information about time limits and did not know the deadline. On that basis, it concluded that an impediment operating on his state of mind made it not reasonably feasible for him to present the claim sooner, and allowed his claim to proceed.
The tribunal separately dealt with Mr Alex Pressley. It accepted on the basis of the tribunal service printout that his matter may have been intended as an associated claim, but he had not replied to the tribunal's correspondence or attended the hearing. His claim was dismissed as out of time and also for want of prosecution/failure to comply with the tribunal's order. The judgment did not determine the merits of Mr Scott's dismissal claim and instead relisted it for a substantive hearing in February 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary time-limit decision only: the tribunal allowed Mr Scott's unfair dismissal claim to proceed, finding it had not been reasonably practicable to present it in time and that it was lodged within a reasonable period after the time limit. The merits were not determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to Mr Alex Pressley as a second claimant, but does not expressly identify the underlying claim type. His claim was dismissed as out of time and also for want of prosecution/failure to comply with the tribunal's order. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- reasonably practicable test
- Palmer v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser
- s.207B ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.