Case 2601874/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Rostron; Mrs Debra Newton;M rs Joanne Church. v Disability Derbyshire Coalition for Inclusive Living Ltd (DDCIL) & Others — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601874/2018
- Decision date
- 21 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F Rostron; Mrs Debra Newton;M rs Joanne Church.
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment dated 21 May 2019. The tribunal held that the claim succeeds against Disability Derbyshire Coalition for Inclusive Living Ltd (DDCIL). The judgment records that the claim continues against the remaining respondents where applicable.
As to remedy, the tribunal did not make a quantified award in this judgment. It directed the Claimants first to supply a schedule of loss within 21 days from the issue of the judgment, limited to what is claimed against DDCIL only. The extracted text does not identify the underlying claim type or types decided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment states only that the claim succeeds against DDCIL and continues against the remaining respondents where applicable. It does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.