Case 2601875/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Lazarczyk v Tech Data Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601875/2019
- Decision date
- 26 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Lazarczyk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Adkinson sat alone and heard evidence from the claimant, documents from both parties, the Tribunal file, and oral argument on 26 November 2019 at Leicester. The judgment records no merits determination of the dismissal dispute because the unfair dismissal claim had been presented out of time. The Tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider that claim and dismissed it on that basis.
The claimant's redundancy payment claim was not determined on the merits either. The Tribunal struck it out because it disclosed no reasonable prospect of success. No monetary award was made, and the written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Presented out of time; the Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claim and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Struck out because it disclosed no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.