Case 2601880/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Ursell & others v Randstad Sourceright Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2601880/2022
- Decision date
- 4 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Ursell & others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with complaints relating to pension contributions. By a letter dated 2 March 2023, it gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why those complaints should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success.
The claimants did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the pension contributions complaint. The judgment records that the hearing listed for 2 and 3 August 2023 remained listed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the complaints relating to pension contributions, referred to at paragraph 6 of the Order of 21 February 2023, were struck out because the claimants did not make representations or request a hearing after being given the opportunity to explain why the complaints should not be struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.