Case 2601881/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Mrs K Riley (2) Mrs P White v The Peoples Ability Network Limited (Dissolved) and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601881/2018
- Decision date
- 17 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rachel Broughton
Parties
3 namedClaimant
(1) Mrs K Riley (2) Mrs P White
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Nottingham on 14 January 2020, Employment Judge Rachel Broughton, sitting alone, determined that there was a relevant transfer within the meaning of regulation 3(1)(b)(ii) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006. The tribunal found that the transfer was a service provision change and that the claimants' employment transferred from The Peoples Ability Network Limited to Paypacket Limited with effect from 26 February 2018.
The first respondent did not attend the hearing. The second respondent was represented by counsel. The written record states that case management orders were attached, and no monetary remedy was determined in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The tribunal found a relevant transfer, namely a service provision change within regulation 3(1)(b)(ii) of TUPE 2006, and held that the claimants' employment transferred from the first respondent to the second respondent with effect from 26 February 2018. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- regulation 3(1)(b)(ii) TUPE 2006
- service provision change
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.