Case 2601891/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B K Rai v Gurpaul Singh Hayer — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601891/2022
- Decision date
- 16 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B K Rai
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 16 August 2022 and the respondent did not present a valid response in time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the matter under rule 21 on the papers. The tribunal upheld the claimant’s claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,941 gross.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant’s breach of contract claim in respect of notice and awarded £234 in damages. It found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment; the extracted text records this as "£11.134.50", which appears to be an OCR/formatting error and has been treated here as £1,134.50. The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,404.
The separate claim for personal injury arising from an insect bite was dismissed because the Employment Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear and determine personal injury claims. The hearing listed for 4 January 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as gross wages deducted from pay. | Upheld | — | £1,941 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for notice pay. | Upheld | — | £234 |
| Redundancy | The extracted text reads "£11.134.50"; this appears to be an OCR/formatting error and has been treated as £1,134.50. | Upheld | — | £1,135 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,404 |
| Other | Claim for personal injury for an insect bite dismissed because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear personal injury claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,714
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.