Case 2601930/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Sharpe v Dovedale Flooring Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601930/2022
- Decision date
- 28 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Sharpe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. On that basis, the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made without a hearing. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr N Sharpe, was dismissed by reason of redundancy.
The only substantive finding recorded is that the claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,600. The judgment does not set out any separate findings on breach of contract or any other claim type, and it cancels all future hearings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,600. | Upheld | — | £3,600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,600
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.