Case 2601936/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Thomas Mr S Thomas v Meridian Restaurants Cleethorpes Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601936/2017
- Decision date
- 4 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Thomas Mr S Thomas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 37 strike-out judgment in case numbers 2601936/2017 and 2601937/2017. By letter dated 8 May 2019, the tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Adkinson ordered that the claims be struck out. The judgment does not record any merits findings or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment is a Rule 37 strike-out decision and does not set out the substantive heads of claim. This claim type is inferred from the case listing categories supplied with the record. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment is a Rule 37 strike-out decision and does not set out the substantive heads of claim. This claim type is inferred from the case listing categories supplied with the record. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.