Case 2601945/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Bailey v Celebrity Motion Furniture Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2601945/2020
- Decision date
- 3 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ayre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Bailey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment states that the claim by Mr M Bailey against Celebrity Motion Furniture Limited was struck out. The reason given was that, by letter dated 1 November 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Ayre ordered that the claim be struck out. No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out for not being actively pursued after the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing following the Tribunal's 1 November 2022 letter. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.