Case 2601964/2013 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Nottingham City Council and Nottingham Revenues and Benefits Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601964/2013
- Decision date
- 21 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims listed under case number 2601964/2013 and the associated claim numbers against Nottingham City Council and Nottingham Revenues & Benefits Ltd were dismissed on 21 July 2020. The dismissal was made in accordance with rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The stated reason was failure to comply with the order of 1 July 2020. That order required the claimants to provide the Tribunal and the respondents’ representatives with an email address to be used, if they had one, or, if they did not have one, to confirm their postal address to both the Tribunal and the respondents’ representatives.
No substantive liability issues or remedy issues were determined in the extracted judgment text, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Procedural dismissal under rule 38 for failure to comply with the order of 1 July 2020. The extracted text does not specify the underlying substantive claim type(s). | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.