Case 2601984/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Speechley v Greenwood Academies Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 2601984/2019
- Decision date
- 28 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Speechley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAfter hearing evidence from both parties and considering the agreed bundle together with written and oral submissions, Employment Judge Adkinson found that Ms J Speechley’s complaint of unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded. The judgment records no further liability findings beyond that conclusion.
The tribunal ordered Greenwood Academies Trust to pay Ms Speechley £13,883.53 gross. The written record does not split the sum into separate heads of loss or identify any additional remedy calculations.
The decision was given orally at the hearing on 28 November 2019, and the written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard practice. No lay members are listed on the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's complaint under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 well-founded and ordered payment of £13,883.53 gross. The written record does not set out any separate breakdown of the award. | Upheld | — | £13,884 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,884
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Rights Act 1996 section 13
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.