Case 2601986/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Trow v Atalian Servest Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2601986/2019
- Decision date
- 23 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clark
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Trow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. Following that withdrawal, the proceedings were dismissed under rule 52.
No substantive findings on unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, breach of contract, liability, or remedy are set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The specific component claims are not individually listed in the judgment text; this claim type follows the listing category and Layer 1 hint. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The specific component claims are not individually listed in the judgment text; this claim type follows the listing category and Layer 1 hint. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The specific component claims are not individually listed in the judgment text; this claim type follows the listing category and Layer 1 hint. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.