Case 2601994/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Olusoga v Jordan Xavier Connect Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2601994/2023
- Decision date
- 12 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Olusoga
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal recorded that the claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 18 September 2023 and that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. On that basis, the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment states that the claim succeeds. No substantive merits findings or monetary award are set out in this judgment. Instead, the tribunal directed that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a separate remedy hearing.
The judgment also records that the hearing listed on 27 March 2024 will proceed as a remedy hearing. No panel members are listed, and no compensation figure is given in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text refers only to 'the claim'; the case listing categorises the matter as unfair dismissal. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.