Case 2602004/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Edward Marshall v New Standard Club and Institute — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602004/2023
- Decision date
- 5 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Lincoln Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Edward Marshall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the attended hearing on 22 January 2024, before Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The written record states that the judgment was given orally at the hearing and then recorded in writing. The tribunal held that Edward Marshall was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,634.64.
The tribunal also found that The New Standard Club & Institute was in breach of contract because it failed to give notice of termination of employment. Compensation for that breach was assessed at £1,368.00. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had not paid outstanding accrued but untaken holiday and ordered payment of £155.68 gross.
The total of the sums ordered by the tribunal was £3,158.32. The written record does not set out detailed reasons beyond the orders themselves, and no discrimination, whistleblowing, or other additional claims are recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment in the sum of £1,634.64. | Upheld | — | £1,635 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the respondent was in breach of contract because it failed to give the claimant notice of termination of employment, and assessed compensation at £1,368.00. | Upheld | — | £1,368 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay outstanding accrued but untaken holiday and ordered payment of £155.68 gross. | Upheld | — | £156 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,158
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.