Ms D Cesuniene v Amazon UK Services Limited — 2026

Employment Judge Brewer refused Ms D Cesuniene's application to reconsider the judgment sent to the parties on 20 July 2026, which had struck out her direct age discrimination claim. The judge found there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked.

The tribunal said that, after two years of litigation, the claimant had not adequately identified any actual comparators and did not know the ages of the colleagues on whom she sought to rely. The alleged training package had also not been properly identified. The judge found that the claimant's account of whether she had completed four training sessions had changed without explanation.

The tribunal found that the claim amounted to an assertion that an unidentified training package had not been offered to the claimant but had been offered to unidentified colleagues of unknown ages. It also found that the claimant had not explained why the alleged treatment was related to age, either through direct evidence or evidence from which adverse inferences could be drawn. Nothing in the reconsideration application was new, and the application was refused. No remedy was recorded.