Case 2602049/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lee Stainton v John E Haith Limited Record of a Hearing by CVP at the Employment Tribunal — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602049/2023
- Decision date
- 28 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Lee Stainton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hutchinson, sitting alone at Nottingham via CVP, determined Mr Lee Stainton's claims against John E Haith Limited. The Judge found that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed and ordered the Respondent to pay a basic award of £7,904.00, with no compensatory award made. The claim for a redundancy payment failed and was dismissed.
The Judge further found that the Claimant had suffered an unlawful deduction of wages and ordered the Respondent to pay £1,520.00. The claim for holiday pay was withdrawn and dismissed on withdrawal. The Judge also found that the Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered compensation of £3,338.04.
The total award the Respondent was ordered to pay was £12,762.04. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons were not to be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award of £7,904.00 ordered; no compensatory award. | Upheld | — | £7,904 |
| Redundancy | Claim for a redundancy payment failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Respondent ordered to pay £1,520.00 for unlawful deduction of wages. | Upheld | — | £1,520 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim withdrawn and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; compensation of £3,338.04 ordered. | Upheld | — | £3,338 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,762
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £7,904
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.