Case 2602059/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Allen v K & G Lambley Trading Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602059/2018
- Decision date
- 25 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Blackwell
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Allen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 22 October 2019 at Nottingham, Employment Judge Blackwell, sitting alone, determined a preliminary issue about disability. The judgment records that Mr T Allen was not disabled within the meaning of section 6 and Schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010.
Because that threshold issue was decided against the claimant, the judgment did not determine any substantive disability discrimination liability or any monetary remedy. It instead directed that the remaining heads of claim, described as automatically constructive unfair dismissal, unpaid wages, unpaid notice pay and unpaid holiday pay, would proceed to a full hearing before an Employment Judge sitting alone on 2 and 3 December 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal held that the claimant was not disabled within the meaning of section 6 and Schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010. The remaining heads of claim were listed to proceed to a later full hearing. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 6 and Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.