Case 2602072/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Blood v The Yews Residential Home Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602072/2019
- Decision date
- 25 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Blackwell
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Blood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Blackwell sat alone in Nottingham on 11 and 12 November 2019, with the Claimant appearing in person and the Respondent represented by an HR consultant. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and are not set out in the document itself.
The tribunal dismissed the claim of constructive unfair dismissal. The judgment does not record the tribunal's detailed reasoning in the written reasons field, only the outcome.
The claim of unlawful deduction from wages succeeded to the extent of arrears of pay. The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay Mrs T Blood the gross sum of £393.57. No other remedy component is recorded in the written decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim of constructive unfair dismissal; it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim succeeded in respect of arrears of pay, and the Respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £393.57. | Upheld | — | £394 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £394
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.