Case 2602093/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Mirza v FirstSource Solutions UK Limited [R1] Sky Subscriptions Services Limited [R2] PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602093/2023
- Decision date
- 19 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Mirza
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Shore on 16 September 2024, heard remotely from Nottingham Tribunal Hearing Centre. The claimant, Mrs R Mirza, appeared in person. The respondents were represented by Mr L Hodgson for FirstSource Solutions UK Limited and Mr R Multani for Sky Subscriptions Services Limited.
The only recorded substantive order is that, by consent, the first respondent, FirstSource Solutions UK Limited, was removed as a respondent in the proceedings. The written record does not contain any findings on liability, any determination of discrimination or other claims, or any remedy award.
The tribunal also noted that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further outcome is recorded in the written judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not adjudicate any substantive claim. It records only that, by consent, the first respondent was removed from the proceedings at a preliminary hearing. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.