Case 2602102/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Ndegwa v 1) University Hospitals Of Leicester NHS Trust 2) Asif Patel 3) Donna White — 2021
- Case reference
- 2602102/2018
- Decision date
- 8 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Ndegwa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claimant's case under rule 37. By letter dated 24 March 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 22 September 2020 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 19 April 2021 to 21 April 2021 did not take place. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action; it records that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37 because the claimant did not comply with the tribunal's order dated 22 September 2020 and had not actively pursued the case. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.