Case 2602125/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Hextall v Turus Vehicle Transport Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 2602125/2021
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Hextall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands (East) Employment Tribunals on 6 September 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Adkinson Date determined the matter under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No further hearing was required and all future hearings were cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £270 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £15.30 gross. The total monetary award on the face of the judgment was £285.30 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under Rule 21; the tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £270 gross. | Upheld | — | £270 |
| Holiday pay | Default judgment under Rule 21; the tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £15.30 gross. | Upheld | — | £15 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £285
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.