Case 2602127/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Walker v Corps Security (UK) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602127/2019
- Decision date
- 3 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on withdrawal. Employment Judge Adkinson recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
The judgment does not set out any findings on liability, facts, legal tests, or remedy. It contains no substantive determination of the pleaded claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. This claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than specified in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. This claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than specified in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. This claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories rather than specified in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.