Case 2602128/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Bosworth v Phoenix Pet Foods Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2602128/2021
- Decision date
- 4 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Nottingham Employment Tribunal on 13 September 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time or at all, and Employment Judge P Britton decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claim for unfair dismissal succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant compensation in the total sum of £7,473.64, said to be in accordance with the claimant’s statement of losses dated 29 October 2021. The judgment does not split that figure between different heads of loss.
The judgment also records that the other claims for redundancy payment and breach of contract were subsumed within the award. The hearing listed for 20 January 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £7,474 |
| Redundancy | Mentioned as being subsumed within the unfair dismissal award; no separate disposal or separate amount was stated. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Mentioned as being subsumed within the unfair dismissal award; no separate disposal or separate amount was stated. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,474
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.