Case 2602129/2019 · Employment Tribunal
L Brown v Kimberley Town Council Considered at: Nottingham Justice Centre, Carrington Street, Nottingham, NG2 1EE — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602129/2019
- Decision date
- 15 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter from the claimant's solicitor dated 15 November 2019, the claimant withdrew all of her claims of discrimination and all claims relating to public interest disclosure. The tribunal recorded that withdrawal and made orders dismissing the age discrimination claims, the sex discrimination claims, and the claims for detriment or dismissal for making a public interest disclosure.
The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of those claims. It states that the dismissal of those claims does not affect remaining claims, and that further orders would be issued separately in relation to those remaining matters.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The claimant's solicitor wrote on 15 November 2019 withdrawing all discrimination claims. The tribunal nevertheless ordered the age discrimination claims dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | The claimant's solicitor wrote on 15 November 2019 withdrawing all discrimination claims. The tribunal nevertheless ordered the sex discrimination claims dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Whistleblowing | The claimant's solicitor wrote on 15 November 2019 withdrawing all claims relating to public interest disclosure. The tribunal ordered the detriment or dismissal claims for making a protected disclosure dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.