Case 2602134/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr SM Boutorabi v Aten Global Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2602134/2021
- Decision date
- 8 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr SM Boutorabi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Employment Tribunals on 7 September 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Maxwell Date determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the papers, the tribunal found that Aten Global Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered payment of unpaid salary of £10,916.78 and unpaid pension contributions of £10,000.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £6,134.60. The judgment records a total award of £27,051.38.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of unpaid salary (£10,916.78) and unpaid pension contributions (£10,000). | Upheld | — | £20,917 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £6,135 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £27,051
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.