Case 2602135/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M A Harrison v Welcome Nurseries Limited (In Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602135/2021
- Decision date
- 19 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M A Harrison
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 7 December 2021. The respondent, Welcome Nurseries Limited (In Administration), was permitted to proceed because the administrators lifted the moratorium, and the respondent admitted the claim in full. The Employment Judge proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and made a determination on the papers.
The tribunal held that Mrs M A Harrison was unfairly dismissed. It awarded a basic award of £9,855.04 and a compensatory award of £4,700.65. The judgment also records £500 for loss of statutory rights and £526.95 interest.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The respondent was in administration, the administrators lifted the moratorium so the claim could proceed, and the respondent admitted the claim in full. The Employment Judge held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded a basic award of £9,855.04, a compensatory award of £4,700.65, £500 in respect of loss of statutory rights, and £526.95 interest. | Upheld | — | £15,583 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,583
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £9,855
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,701
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.