Case 2602140/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms. A Beech - Counsel This has been a remote hearing which has not been objected to by the parties. A face to face hearing was not held because no-one requested the same and all issues could be determined in a remote hearing. — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602140/2022
- Decision date
- 15 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 11 January 2024 Employment Judge Heap sat alone in Nottingham by Cloud Video Platform to hear case management applications in Dr P Mistry v University Hospitals of Derby & Burton NHS Foundation Trust. The hearing concerned the claimant's application under Rule 50 for the preliminary hearing to be held in private and the respondent's application to strike out the claim under Rule 37, or alternatively for an unless order under Rule 38. The background was that at a hearing on 9 August 2023 Employment Judge Adkinson had withdrawn an unfair dismissal complaint for insufficient service and ordered the claimant to provide further information about the disability discrimination complaints, a disability impact statement, and medical records relevant to disability.