Case 2602141/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gordon of Counsel For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602141/2017
- Decision date
- 30 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Clark
- Venue
- Lincoln
- Panel members
- Mrs J Bonser, Mr C Goldson
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Gordon of Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Lincoln on 18, 20, 21 and 25 March 2019, the unanimous Employment Tribunal consisting of Employment Judge R Clark, Mrs J Bonser and Mr C Goldson recorded that the claimant's redundancy payment, notice pay and holiday pay claims were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim, the claim of discrimination because of pregnancy or maternity, and the direct and indirect sex discrimination claims. The extract states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in writing within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Claim of discrimination because of pregnancy or maternity. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | Indirect sex discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.