Case 2602160/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Perkins v Everyman Motor Racing Activities Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602160/2019
- Decision date
- 25 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Perkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Heap found that Everyman Motor Racing Activities Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr P Perkins' wages and ordered payment of £2,055.00 gross. The judgment also recorded that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, with damages of £412.50 awarded.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £123.75. The hearing listed for 25 October 2019 was cancelled. The judgment does not separate the award into wider heads of loss beyond the three specific sums stated, and the aggregate of those amounts is £2,591.25.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from wages and was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,055.00. | Upheld | — | £2,055 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £412.50. | Upheld | — | £413 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £123.75. | Upheld | — | £124 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,591
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.