Case 2602162/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Green v The Chapar Online Styling Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2602162/2022
- Decision date
- 10 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Representation
- Venue
- Nottingham Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remedy hearing before Employment Judge S Shore at Nottingham Hearing Centre on 3 June 2024. By an earlier Judgment dated 13 November 2023, the respondent's response to the claimant's sex discrimination claim had been struck out and judgment entered in favour of the claimant under Rule 21. The respondent did not appear at the remedy hearing; the claimant appeared in person.
The Tribunal awarded the claimant £5,000.00 for injury to feelings, plus interest at 8% calculated from 7 September 2022 to 3 June 2024 (635 days), amounting to £698.50. The Tribunal also awarded £1,337.00 in respect of one month's net wages, plus interest at 8% from 7 September 2022 to 21 July 2023 (the halfway point to the date of calculation, 318 days), amounting to £92.22.
The total sum the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant is £7,127.72.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Liability was determined by an earlier Judgment dated 13 November 2023 under Rule 21 after the respondent's response was struck out. This hearing was a remedy hearing only. | Upheld | Sex | £7,128 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,128
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,337
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.