Case 2602191/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Beri v LGCT International Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602191/2019
- Decision date
- 26 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Beri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mr P Beri against LGCT International Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £4,615.36 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £576.92 in damages, and that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement, awarding £377.48.
The judgment further recorded that the respondent had failed to provide itemised pay statements under section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. In the absence of any explanation from the respondent for the deductions and the lack of itemised pay statements, the tribunal ordered payment of £1,730.36 pursuant to section 12(4) of the Act in respect of unnotified deductions in the 13 weeks before the claim was presented on 1 August 2019. The total amount payable was recorded as £7,300.52, and the hearing listed for 1 October 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £4,615 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages in the sum stated. | Upheld | — | £577 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the sum stated. | Upheld | — | £377 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements in accordance with section 8 ERA 1996 and, in the absence of any explanation for the deductions and missing statements, ordered payment pursuant to section 12(4) ERA 1996. The extracted text records this sum alongside a total payable of £7,300.52, which does not exactly reconcile with the other itemised awards in the OCR text. | Upheld | — | £1,730 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,301
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 12(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.