Case 2602196/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Ink v Endeavour Recruitment Services Limited FINAL HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 2602196/2018
- Decision date
- 9 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Ink
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the final hearing on 7 October 2020, heard via CVP before Employment Judge Camp, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr P Judge, Director. The judgment records that the claimant's claim failed and was dismissed.
The supplied extract does not set out the tribunal's oral reasons or distinguish the individual heads of claim. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons were requested, so no award or other remedy is recorded in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment text states only that the claimant's claim failed and was dismissed; it does not separate the individual heads of claim. This claim type is taken from the case listing provided in the case context. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text states only that the claimant's claim failed and was dismissed; it does not separate the individual heads of claim. This claim type is taken from the case listing provided in the case context. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.