Case 2602233/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M McCormick v Creative Spaces Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602233/2019
- Decision date
- 26 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Britton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M McCormick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the tribunal's universal template. The tribunal recorded that Mr M McCormick was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment calculated at 5 x £442, giving a total of £2,210.
The judgment does not record any disputed liability findings beyond the redundancy entitlement. It also states that, for the benefit of the Secretary of State and payment from the Insolvency Fund, section 166 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 applies to this specific award.
The hearing listed for 2 December 2019 was cancelled. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Britton on 26 November 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment calculated as 5 x £442 = £2,210. The judgment states that s.166 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 applies to this specific award for the benefit of the Secretary of State and payment from the Insolvency Fund. | Upheld | — | £2,210 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,210
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.166 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.