Case 2602236/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Sachdev v Centrica plc — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602236/2019
- Decision date
- 31 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Sachdev
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew the claim. Following that withdrawal, the proceedings were dismissed under rule 52.
The judgment does not set out any adjudicated findings on the merits, legal reasoning, or remedy. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim. The specific pleaded claims are not set out in the judgment text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category/hint. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim. The specific pleaded claims are not set out in the judgment text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category/hint. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim. The specific pleaded claims are not set out in the judgment text; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category/hint. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.