Case 2602237/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. MK Sandhu v Bray & Bray Solicitors — 2019
- Case reference
- 2602237/2019
- Decision date
- 19 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. MK Sandhu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on withdrawal dated 13 November 2019 in which Employment Judge Heap recorded that the claimant's complaint of wrongful dismissal was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52. The judgment does not determine the merits of that complaint.
The same judgment states that it does not affect the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint, which was to proceed to hearing. No remedy was recorded in this judgment, and no financial award is set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.